Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Lessons of the Action Center in Terms of Engagement

The lecture at the Action Center this week really seemed to finally get to the idea of what the point of all these visits have been; that your vision can become something that will be able to be replicated and active. Other lectures up to this point have taken us to interesting places and demonstrated the core values of the institutions, but none have quite shown us exactly what active engagement looks like in the sphere of social entrepreneurship. At the Action Center it was clear how great ideas can effectively communicated in a physical space, and how interaction with the end-users who seem to more and more be making up the donors of these place are really impacting issues like hunger. The building reminded me highly of the incredible Liberty Science Center, with an approach not like typical educational centers with a goal of communicating detailed ideas, personal stories and experiences of the organization. The use of headphones hanging from the was clever, though it did have some drawbacks in terms of clutter, and the institution was spot on with detailing how little amounts of time can add up with their various time-frame oriented activities. Nothing spurns donor activity quite like this, and they deserve respect for implementing it so effectively and in an appealing fashion.

The details that make the Action Center successful should be monitored closely by FastForwardFund in an effort to imitate the best aspects of the program. While the institution was able to educate individuals well, and provide intense amounts of information, it failed with some of its touch screens to present a simple enough picture to not intimidate. If Fast Forward Fund wants to engage its donors effectively, it should remember to stick to simplicity in describing its issues. People who are really interested and engaged will find the more detailed information no matter what, so putting it all up front is more of an obstacle to the casual donor than a benevolent action.

1 comment:

  1. Rachel OppenheimerMay 7, 2009 at 9:42 AM

    On the note of 'presenting a simple enough picture to not intimidate,' I agree in theory. I would qualify that idea by adding that we want to engage the activist. I think we can give more credit to the individual who has come to the ActionCenter. Given the incredible amount of information at the topic/issue screens, I found methods of teaching and interaction involved or invited really impressive. The information was expansive, yes, but the individual both has the opportunity to choose his or her path of knowledge and activism, and also can let the videos and visuals take him or her on a journey -- really getting substantive information through in a captivating way.

    I, too, found the ActionCenter really inspiring. The environment was welcoming and pleasant, and I ate up (pun partially intended?) the idea of solving world hunger in a sustainable way - through inseparable means such as education, conflict-resolution, etc.

    --So much so that I think I may change my Core Seminar final research paper to using governance or education means to end world hunger in a yet-to-be-determined country.

    ReplyDelete